Re: Description-less packages file
On 12750 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it is
> unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find a reasonable
> decision for the UDD importer.
It's not just a simple oneline more thing. It ends up being "long desc
goes away, d-md5 field gets in". Plenty disruptive.
<maxx> Aqua mach mal man brain....
<Aquariophile> maxx: schon probiert das gibts ned