On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:57:01AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 01.02.2012 07:09, owner@bugs.debian.org wrote: > >># Source package in NEW: boost-defaults > >>tags 653823 + pending > >Bug #653823 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults > > Please don't do that. Aside from being arguably inappropriate > (along with a bunch of other cases in which pseudo-package bugs are > closed in package uploads), it's also wrong... My apologies; I just wanted to mark it closed while it was top of my mind. Otherwise, I will tend to forget things. > The base goal of any transition is for a package (or more commonly > set of packages) to migrate to testing. Having the new package > accepted in to unstable is a key step on the path to that goal, but > it doesn't resolve anything in and of itself. I didn't understand that, but it makes sense. I will reopen the bug after boost-defaults is processed. Assuming I remember :-) Regards, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature