Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 30/01/12 19:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
>
>> On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please don't change the -dev package name.
>>>>
>>>> All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends
>>>> on libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with
>>>> libconfig-dev or at least libconfig9-dev?
>>>>
>>> No it doesn't? You can rename the -dev package to
>>> libconfig-dev if you want, but certainly don't *need* to, and
>>> if you do it, then it would be way better from our point of
>>> view to keep building libconfig8-dev as a transitional package
>>> until the reverse deps are updated, and to do that separately
>>> from the SONAME bump.
>>
>> If its ok, I'll leave the package as is.
>>
> Sigh.
I can change it if it makes it easier for you so. Your paragraph above
made it sound as if it didn't matter which way it was done.
>> To clarify, what is the process for this transition? Will the
>> package be uploaded to experimental to allow me to report bug
>> reports and patches against dependant packages?
>>
> I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.
This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure
of what happens next. It seems common for packages to be uploaded to
experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other
maintainers update their packages accordingly. I was wondering will
this be the case with this transition?
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPJyLhAAoJEJ6XA7Whh53bSLkH+gPIvSxmXV/flNb8OeTbQTjz
we7Df28cckf4SrqMA2/scs1womzy88xgdXpSRhHFlhFpRt+2voKXfVMDoM0A9Mth
+7tQTivdz41+FAWt5oLMNT96vAvHIebxTSAREroEZZjPm0129u4LoSleJsIx/gM/
swcB3Jp3N9fHOcXYu5VC+WiOMqNgalaCTcbT4BWdxZkP7Xf2XvIQ0I+347ncIU5d
UOtOzHdqheHh0Nw6FZdxvBHttUqwUqVqylcjLKPuxMMleL4JgZ4oIOCqFlfUEdtk
DsfcuTANX3H2xwhM82YQ41SXXlExTJ4G5zQ3i5N8JFDLSc2uvwk+neBk7ubUT6k=
=Nyvp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: