Re: sysvinit testing migration
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 13:29 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 12:20:34PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > libpam-mount depends on Linux-only libraries (libpam-mount), and
> > additionally dropped support for BSD mount upstream, so should
> > no longer be considered buildable or usable on kfreebsd for the
> > time being at least.
> It still needs its obsolete binaries removed.
Indeed. Someone needs to file an appropriate removal bug against
> > libhx also appears to be blocking libpam-mount, but it's claiming
> > libhx27 is out of date (but it's no longer present, replaced by
> > libhx28).
It *is* still present, as checking packages files or something like the
below will show:
$ dak ls libhx27
libhx27 | 3.11-1 | testing | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libhx27 | 3.11-1 | unstable | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
> Same here. Can't check at the moment if there are still rdeps.
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
libpam-mount: libpam-mount [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386]
So fixing the first issue should allow libhx27 to be auto-crufted; it's
already on the cruft report.
> britney is usually correct about the reasons.
Indeed. That doesn't stop people arguing that's she wrong on a
regularish basis, though. :-/