Bug#627394: marked as done (transition: rpm)
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2011 08:40:34 +0200
with message-id <4DE33BE2.3070002@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#627394: transition: rpm
has caused the Debian Bug report #627394,
regarding transition: rpm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
627394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with asking
here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable.
Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be broken:
dose2: librpm-dev
fossology: librpm-dev
libextractor: librpm-dev
rpm2html: librpm-dev
I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them.
The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452.
- --
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=AujB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 05/20/2011 11:57 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
>
> Hi
>
> I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with
> asking here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable.
>
> Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be
> broken:
>
> dose2: librpm-dev fossology: librpm-dev libextractor: librpm-dev
> rpm2html: librpm-dev
>
> I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them.
>
> The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452.
>
It has migrated.
rpm | 4.9.0-5 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: