Bug#619988: marked as done (transition: eglibc 2.13)
Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 00:39:42 +0200
with message-id <20110513223942.GG2809@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#619988: transition: eglibc 2.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #619988,
regarding transition: eglibc 2.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
619988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619988
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: eglibc 2.13
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:57:26 +0200
- Message-id: <20110328215726.27214.68495.reportbug@volta.aurel32.net>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
eglibc 2.13 is now in a good shape in experimental, it builds on all
release architectures plus at least hurd, sh4 and sparc64. It still
FTBFS on hppa, but the porters have been informed.
It's now time to upload it to unstable. The eglibc packages use symbol
files, so only packages using new symbols, and NSS related packages
would pick up a new dependency and will have to wait until eglibc 2.13
migrates to testing. I am not aware of any big changes in include files
that can cause FTBFS, but I haven't done extensive tests either.
Please give your green light when you think it is possible to do the
upload to unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Aurelien Jarno <aurel32@debian.org>, 619988-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#619988: transition: eglibc 2.13
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:39:42 +0200
- Message-id: <20110513223942.GG2809@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <20110328215726.27214.68495.reportbug@volta.aurel32.net>
- References: <20110328215726.27214.68495.reportbug@volta.aurel32.net>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 23:57:26 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> eglibc 2.13 is now in a good shape in experimental, it builds on all
> release architectures plus at least hurd, sh4 and sparc64. It still
> FTBFS on hppa, but the porters have been informed.
>
eglibc | 2.13-4 | testing | source
Closing.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
Reply to: