RE: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing
Nice, the hint worked and pulled most of the EFL's into testing except for efreet. And
I do not get why. The excuses say that updating efreet introduces new bug: #618502.
This bug was due to a fault in the ecore source package, but it has been resolved.
P.S.: Trying to figure out the qa system.
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:57:57 +0200
> From: email@example.com
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> CC: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing
> On 22/04/2011 13:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> >> This transition is tracked on:
> >> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html
> >> AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition
> >> done.
> > None of those 4 packages are in testing at this point though. (It's
> > possible that some other packages are in testing and need those, I
> > haven't checked.)
> Hum… I'm kind of shocked now :) e17 never reached testing??? (it was obvious
> in my mind, and that's why I didn't even check).
> Thanks for both of you. Hint added now (and tested in my private instance
> of britney).
> Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
> Archive: 4DB16D45.firstname.lastname@example.org">http://lists.debian.org/4DB16D45.email@example.com