Bug#618672: marked as done (pu: package debian-reference/2.46)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2011 23:34:01 +0900
with message-id <20110318143401.GA5163@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#618672: pu: package debian-reference/2.46
has caused the Debian Bug report #618672,
regarding pu: package debian-reference/2.46
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
618672: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618672
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
As reported to debian-release ML with debdiff, I have uploaded
debian-reference/2.46 to stable. It is document content only change.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00425.html
...
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00483.html
(I was not sure if I needed this after posting to ML. But since it has
not been seen squeeze-updates, I am posting as "pu")
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers squeeze-updates
APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:40PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, March 17, 2011 14:04, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > As reported to debian-release ML with debdiff, I have uploaded
> > debian-reference/2.46 to stable. It is document content only change.
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00425.html
> > ...
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00483.html
>
> and it was part of the announcement of packages which were to be included
> in the point release. [1]
Hmmm... I did not know. Thanks.
I was subscribed only to the folowings.
debian-announce@lists.debian.org
debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
debian-infrastructure-announce@lists.debian.org
Now I am subscribed to the followings too.
debian-backports-announce@lists.debian.org
debian-stable-announce@lists.debian.org **
debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org (I recovered this again)
debian-testing-security-announce@lists.debian.org
> > (I was not sure if I needed this after posting to ML. But since it has
> > not been seen squeeze-updates, I am posting as "pu")
>
> I'm confused by the mention of squeeze-updates, as the package was never
> targetted there so far as I'm aware.
I see "stable" goes to proposed-updates.
(I meant for "squeeze-updates" but now it is the same thing)
> The package was uploaded targetted at proposed-updates a while ago, was
> accepted and is simply waiting for the point release at the weekend in
> order to enter stable. All of that has already happened, and there was
> indeed no need for this bug unless I have missed something.
Thanks.
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2011/03/msg00002.html
--- End Message ---
Reply to: