Hi again, [...] > > Minimal testing of the squeeze-specific build has been performed; the same > > version, although built for lenny-volatile, is being "tested" in > > production environments. I'm now uploading to squeeze-updates. > > Unfortunately, the upload got rejected by dak. > > Please could you re-upload using "stable" as the distribution. > "squeeze-updates" is not intended as a direct upload target. > Fixed and re-uploading just now. Is that use of distribution names documented anywhere? I had taken a look at tzdata, which indeed uses "stable", but according to [1] all these are equivalent and I found squeeze-updates to be much more descriptive, hence used that one. Another related question: should one send a working draft of an update announcement to somewhere? I'm used to doing that for volatile, but don't know about the procedures for stable-updates. Best regards, Michael [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/03/msg00007.html
Attachment:
pgpI39lw3IooO.pgp
Description: PGP signature