[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#606384: marked as done (unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:44:14 -0000
with message-id <4a3016dad0a1badc4260005c51f56e9c.squirrel@adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606384: unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606384,
regarding unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
606384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1
and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable
version. 

RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as 4.10.1-1+squeeze2

unblock collectd/4.10.1-2.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, December 9, 2010 07:02, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:03:17PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> > > Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog
>> > > 4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason
>> Steffen
>> > > NMUd the unstable version.
>> > >
>> > > RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as
>> > > 4.10.1-1+squeeze2
>> >
>> > Unfortunately it will need to go through t-p-u.  Although the source
>> > packages were identical other than the changelogs, the reason that
>> > +squeeze1 was t-p-u-ed is that the collectd binary package Recommends:
>> > libesmtp6 which doesn't (and won't) exist in squeeze.
>>
>> Steffen, can you rebuild your NMU for t-p-u, then?
> Yes, I can upload to t-p-u, but not before tomorrow. If someone wants to
> beat me to it, feel free.

I've just approved collectd 4.10.1-1+squeeze2; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: