[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#605519: marked as done (RM: aircrack-ng/1:1.0~rc3-2)



Your message dated Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:00:44 +0100
with message-id <20101201160044.GS5063@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#605519: RM: aircrack-ng/1:1.0~rc3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #605519,
regarding RM: aircrack-ng/1:1.0~rc3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
605519: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove aircrack-ng from Squeez: It has had no maintainer followup on
the current RC bug and the security issue still isn't fixed properly w/o 
upstream reaction. It noticed it, when I was looking into a tpu backport 
for the isolate security fix: http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/728#comment:3

(For the license issue there was also no upstream rection).

Squeeze provides an adequate replacement in the form of pyrit.

Cheers,
        Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 23:04:55 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> 
> Please remove aircrack-ng from Squeez: It has had no maintainer followup on
> the current RC bug and the security issue still isn't fixed properly w/o 
> upstream reaction. It noticed it, when I was looking into a tpu backport 
> for the isolate security fix: http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/728#comment:3
> 
> (For the license issue there was also no upstream rection).
> 
> Squeeze provides an adequate replacement in the form of pyrit.
> 
Removal hint added, thanks.  I was considering unblocking the sid
version, but if there's no active maintainer and upstream isn't
responsive then removal is probably best...

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: