[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#601473: marked as done (unblock: jackd2/1.9.6~dfsg-1)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:18:12 +0100
with message-id <4CF2E334.6090902@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#601473: unblock: jackd2/1.9.6~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #601473,
regarding unblock: jackd2/1.9.6~dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601473: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601473
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package jackd2

This version contains a small but important change: libjack-jackd2-dev now
"Provides: libjack-dev".

Without this change, compiling packages with libjack-jackd-dev2 installed would
require to override build-dependencies (dpkg-buildpackage -d). Likewise, apt-
get build-dep $some_package would pull in jackd1 via libjack-dev, thus
switching the jackd installations (removing jackd2).

So we're basically giving the user the freedom to compile with every available
jack implementation.

This issue has been discussed multiple times on pkg-multimedia-maintainers,
e.g. here

   http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-
maintainers/2010-October/013321.html

Note that the actual diff between jackd2-1.9.5~dfsg-19 and jackd2-1.9.6~dfsg-1
is rather small, it's only Debian-internal housekeeping. Particularly, only few
source code changes have been made.  We already shipped 1.9.5+svn4036, so the
larger debdiff is caused by dropping the svn4036 patch and switching to the new
1.9.6 upstream tarball.

Upstream's 1.9.6 corresponds to r4046:

   http://trac.jackaudio.org/log/jack2/tags/release-1.9.6

Between r4036 and r4046, there are the following changes:

   http://trac.jackaudio.org/log/jack2/trunk/jackmp

r4038 is our Debian fix anyway, r4039 and r4043 are for OSX (obviously, we're
not compiling this code), r4045 is for Win32 (same story) and r4046 is
cosmetic.

So the only real change is r4044, and that's fixing
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/kxstudio/+bug/619014>, so it's nice to have.

For your reference, here are the specific commits to our VCS that cause the
debdiff to grow without altering the unrolled source (quilt push -a):

   http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-
multimedia/jackd2.git;a=commitdiff;h=2e233bb5e419391a315c6108753d48b632f930a7

   http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-
multimedia/jackd2.git;a=commitdiff;h=b9607f3015386e8e012b21a99671bc144d8cc077

   http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-
multimedia/jackd2.git;a=commitdiff;h=e584b64c69a2d49856aa81a79a0609241d59a408

   http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-
multimedia/jackd2.git;a=commitdiff;h=0b7b58bdeea88119062cf69dc540c0b391ae156e


TIA

unblock jackd2/1.9.6~dfsg-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34.1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 11/28/2010 09:24 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> 
> It's true that the diff is not insane and that the changes are mostly in
> the debian directory. But:
> 1) dbus/jackdbus.c has some changes
> 2) dh-buildinfo is added as a build-dependency
> 3) debian/patches/0001_jackrec-rename.patch is dropped, can you explain why?
> 4) debian/patches/sparc-kfreebsd.patch is also dropped, why?
> 

Gah... I forgot¹ that I computed the diff with patches applied on both
sides.
So, I guess those patches were included by upstream.

Unblocked.

¹: I realized that when I was in my bed :)

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: