Re: New slurm-llnl package for squeeze
On 6 November 2010 at 14:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 09:01 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 4 November 2010 at 17:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| > | It looks like the current Debian package doesn't set LD_LIBRARY_PATH at
| > | all in the slurm-llnl-slurmdbd init script. Was the addition of that to
| > | the init script in the updated package intentional? (Upstream's init
| > | script does set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so it makes sense there).
| > So I am totally confused. Does that mean there is no bug?
| Gennaro's proposed fix modifies two init scripts, only one of which
| previously set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The fix for that one script is fine,
| the question was whether the change to the second script was intentional
| and appropriate (as it will lead to an extra directory being added to
| LD_LIBRARY_PATH which was not previously included).
Thank you -- that's how I was reading the discussion to.
But now I need a consensus recommendation as to what I should upload. As the
package was prepared by Gennaro, or with another alteration?
| > Also, the consensus was that for testing I need to upload to testing rather
| > than testing-security?
I have to dash out to take daughter nb two to a soccer game but I can deal
with this later in the day. Given clear instructions (pretty please) we
should be able to get this off our plates in one iteration.
Thanks a bunch, Dirk
Dirk Eddelbuettel | firstname.lastname@example.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com