Re: Bug#597864: libproxy0 not functional without libmozjs2d
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 21:56 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 20:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:29 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 08:12 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > > Does that mean libproxy will depend (as in Depends control field) on
> > > > webkit ? That's going to be a problem later, because iceweasel 4.0 may use
> > > > libproxy (I enabled it, but I'm not entirely sure I'll keep it that way).
> > >
> > > No. It doesn’t depend on libmozjs either, it uses whatever is available
> > > on the system if it has been built against it.
> > 0.3.1-2 does have a Recommends on libwebkit | libmozjs, however.
> Yes, it’s intentional. Do you think it is a problem?
No, I just remembered Mike mentioning having concerns about it. Given:
> Note that I intend to work with libsoup upstreams to get rid of libproxy
> for squeeze+1. I’d recommend against iceweasel using libproxy directly.
however, that sounds like it shouldn't be a problem.