[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#597770: marked as done (pu: binNMU package dar/2.3.8-3)

Your message dated Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:07:14 +0100
with message-id <1285268834.5424.5.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597770: pu: binNMU package dar/2.3.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597770,
regarding pu: binNMU package dar/2.3.8-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

please binNMU dar in stable in order to link dar-static
with libbz2-dev 1.0.5-1+lenny1 for DSA-2112-1/CVE-2010-0405

Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 18:56 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Thursday 23 September 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, September 22, 2010 21:51, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > > please binNMU dar in stable in order to link dar-static
> > > with libbz2-dev 1.0.5-1+lenny1 for DSA-2112-1/CVE-2010-0405
> > 
> > Is there a particular reason this isn't being done via -security,
> > as the dpkg binNMUs were?
> 
> The dar source is not yet on security-master, so a sourceful upload 
> would have been necessary. And the probability of users using dar-
> static on untrusted files seems relatively low, so it's just a minor 
> issue.

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: