Re: chromium not in Squeeze: a bit of communication needed?
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 01:48:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >  A question you might have at this point is: "why you bother about
> > Chromium and not other packages?". Well, I do bother about all
> > packages and I'm just trying to anticipate questions I'll might be
> > asked as soon as Squeeze get released. For instance and for the same
> > reason, I've proposed just yesterday to mention the removal of Plone
> > from Squeeze, and the maintainer has kindly agreed to explain the
> > reasons in the Squeeze release notes. So, I'm not special casing
> > anything here, and I encourage you to point me to other similar
> > cases.
> I think a section of the release notes should include such information.
> It could also include hints at what we plan to do. I don't know what
> Giuseppe plans for chromium, but I for one plan to upload newer versions
> of iceweasel as soon as I can (which might not be as soon as one could
> hope, due to the xulrunner transition that goes with it).
into backports, that is.