Re: Seeking for advice regarding keepalived
Luk Claes schrieb am Saturday, den 14. August 2010:
> On 08/14/2010 09:04 AM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> Hi Alexander
> > some time ago I uploaded keepalived 1.2.0 to debian because it was the first
> > (development) version with ipv6 support for ipvs. I thought/hoped development
> > would be faster so that we have a working/stable version with ipv6 for
> > squeeze. Unfortunatly that wasn't the case. I don't think 1.2.0 should be
> > released with squeeze, but I also don't want to release without keepalived
> > since several people rely on it.
> > So I see two options here:
> > - Upload 1:1.1.17 to unstable/testing (that was the latest version in squeeze
> > before 1.2.0)
> > - Upload 1:1.1.19 to unstable/testing (that is a bugfix release which
> > contains some wanted bugfixes.)
> > The second option would be my preferred one.
> > What do you think?
> At my work place we are using 1.1.19 as we really needed some bugfixes
> which were not in 1.1.15 nor 1.1.17. It works stable and we did not have
> any issues up to now.
> So personally I would go for 1.1.19, so unless there are objections
> please do upload that one.
JFTR I uploaded 1:1.1.20 to unstable a few days ago.