On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org> wrote: >> On 08/15/2010 11:40 PM, Per Andersson wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Adam D. Barratt >>> <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 04:29 +0200, Per Andersson wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thibaut Girka is working on Debian Installer for the Openmoko FreeRunner >>>>> for Summer of Code with Debian. In order for this to work on Squeeze a >>>>> patch is needed for uboot-envtools, which I maintain. >>>>> >>>>> In the packaging git repository I have prepared a bump in debian package >>>>> revision from -2 to -3 for uboot-envtools, which includes the patch. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Please could you let us see a debdiff for the proposed upload? >>>> >>> >>> avtobiff@pong:~/debian/packages/pkg-fso$ debdiff >>> /var/cache/apt/archives/uboot-envtools_20081215-2_i386.deb >>> uboot-envtools_20081215-3_i386.deb >>> [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have >>> different names, permissions or owners.] >>> >> >> Could you please actually debdiff the dscs? debdiff'ing the debs is not >> really helpful for reviewing. > > Sorry, debdiff of dscs attached. I realized that the diff is probably way too big. I removed at least half of the debdiff, attached. Regarding uboot-mkimage and the proposed NMU or adoption. Is it possible to adopt the package now or should I wait? Attaching debdiff for uboot-mkimage (NMU), only difference in the case of adoption would of course be me as maintainer. -- Per
Attachment:
uboot-envtools_20081215.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
uboot-mkimage-0.4-broken-uboot-compat.debdiff
Description: Binary data