[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#571949: marked as done (nmu: liblouisxml_2.1.0-1)



Your message dated Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:08:57 +0000
with message-id <1267369737.22579.681.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#571949: nmu: liblouisxml_2.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #571949,
regarding nmu: liblouisxml_2.1.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
571949: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571949
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello,

liblouis has changed its ABI and thus the library package name.
liblouisxml now needs to be rebuilt against the new library (it is the
only package using it).

nmu liblouisxml_2.1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against the new liblouis2"

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.33 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 14:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> liblouis has changed its ABI and thus the library package name.
> liblouisxml now needs to be rebuilt against the new library (it is the
> only package using it).
> 
> nmu liblouisxml_2.1.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against the new liblouis2"

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam


--- End Message ---

Reply to: