"Steve M. Robbins" <steve@sumost.ca> writes:
> So, three questions:
>
> 1. Is it appropriate to change boost-defaults now (from a transitions
> point of view)?
No. We are currently trying to work out the hdf5 and ghc6 transitions
and have enormous buildd backlogs on mips*, making a binNMU campagain
for long-building packages (and let's face it, most of boost users take
more than a few seconds to build...) a problem right now.
> 2. If so, is it a problem to have boost-defaults point to a version
> not yet in testing?
Yes, this could complicate matters.
> 3. If so, would you advise waiting for 1.42 to transition, or
> to update to 1.41 now then update to 1.42 when it does transition?
No, please switch to 1.42 directly.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
217: geräteunabhängig
Sieht nirgends gut aus. Ist nicht Herstellers Schuld. (Dietz Proepper)
Attachment:
pgp_6IRvn8_u7.pgp
Description: PGP signature