[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4



Hi,

Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 +0000 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > ok, then maybe something is broken with
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash
> > because only 2.2.9-4 is listed for amd64?
> 
> It's a feature.
> 
> Both /status/package.php and /pkg.cgi only display binNMUs until they're
> uploaded, and then revert to the source version.  This is a side-effect
> of the fact that wanna-build only stores the binNMU information during
> the time between the binNMU being scheduled and it being uploaded; the
> wanna-build commands used to build the pages therefore only output
> references to the binNMU version during that time.
> 
> https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=gnucash shows logs for all
> versions of the package, including binNMUs.

hmm, thanks for the information. This is a recent change, isn’t it?

Is the information reverted when package is uploaded, or when it’s
installed? I.e. is there a time frame where I would not know about a
binNMUed package from either the archive or the wanna-build dump?

/me finds this all very confusing, especially WRT to handling binNMU
campaigns.

I was about to check whether 
https://buildd.debian.org/stats/amd64-dump.txt.gz
also lacks the binNMU data, but it seems like that file has not been
updated since somewhen in January. Will that file be available
eventually?

Thanks,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Reply to: