> (Bcc: clamav maintainers for the P.S. below.) > Don't see a need to BCC, moved to CC, no secrets seen in here. [...] > > > Clamav P.S.: Was using 0.94.dfsg.1-1 instead of 0.94.1.dfsg-1 on purpose > or just a mistake? > Well, the mistake happened at the time of choosing 0.94.dfsg as a version name. Because of that unfortunate choice on our side we need to stick with that kind of version scheme until 0.95 is out (well, unless we introduce an epoch): dpkg --compare-versions 0.94.dfsg lt 0.94.1.dfsg ; echo $? --> yields 1, that is, it does not hold, i.e. dfsg is sorted before 1. Best, Michael PS.: Thanks for unblocking!
Description: PGP signature