Re: freeze exception for jifty 0.80408-2
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sunday 24 August 2008 17:52, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> It would be a pity if jifty will not be in lenny while near 20 new
>>> needed dependencies were added for jifty and they will be almost useless
>>> without it.
>> No, sorry, in general we don't include new packages into lenny at this
> Would it make sense then to also keep those "20 dependencies" out of lenny?
If it are Depends ones, they won't get into lenny. If it are
Build-Depends ones, we will check for them before the release.