Re: noweb stuck in sid
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:27:57AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]:
>>> How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the
>>> dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied with
>>> the version of icon that's in testing?
>> There is no noweb in armel in testing, though, so in order to migrate
>> noweb/2.11b-7/armel, britney wants to migrate iconx/9.4.3-1/armel first.
>> And see #475952 about that...
>> However, since noweb/armel is broken in testing anyway, migrating it
>> does not makes things worse, so I've added a force hint to let noweb
> And to fix that last part, should I upload a icon/9.4.2-2.8/armel to
> t-p-u or can you force icon/9.4.3-1/armel in?
That version is already unblocked as being in unstable at the moment of