Re: Bug#479751: azureus: Requires Sun Java
peter green wrote:
>> Since openjdk is now available in main, wouldn't that be the best
> It would if it was in lenny but unfortunately openjdk was delayed hugely
> by license issues :(. Now we have a situation where afiact openjdk will
> only make it into lenny if one of the following happens.
> *The "rc" bug (491362) that is open against openjdk gets downgraded (I
> beleive it should be downgraded but as a non-dd I don't belive it is my
> place to downgrade a bug based on an unclear bit of the rc policy) and
> openjdk slots in just before the freeze (btw is there any actual date
> set for that or is it just "sometime next week"
I don't see any reason we should downgrade an FTBFS bug on most
> *The rc bug is fixed and the release team makes a freeze exception or an
> urgent hint to get openjdk in before the freeze
Fixing the bug looks indeed like the best option.
> *the freeze is delayed
Not an option currently...