Re: buildd ordering: where to make a suggestion?
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:17:49PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I agree that enough buildd power would be a good thing, but that do
> not mean the ordering should not be tuned. Packages will a lot of
> reverse dependencies, and at least packages with reverse dependencies
> the buildd queue, should be built before their reverse dependencies.
This is mostly done by ordering the sections. For instance libs
has the highest priority, and is followed by debian-installer, base
(which doesn't exist anymore?) and devel.