Re: Should tasksel be installable on all archs?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org> writes:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:35:49AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> On Jan 27, 2008 10:07 PM, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote:
>>
>>> > How is this supposed to be resolved?
>>
>>> > And as tasksel depends on laptop-detect, this makes tasksel uninstallable on
>>> > s390
>>
>>> Probably just change the dependency to !s390.
>>
>> Not possible without changing tasksel from arch: all to arch: any.
>
> Ahh right.
>
> In this case, I'll readd s390 back to laptop-detect.
Well ... basically ...
After thinking a bit more about it I'm unsure if it's better or not to
change tasksel to arch any and properly handle it.
Joey, could you give us your opinion about it?
My opinion is that laptop-detect ought to be droped and not be
installed, by default, except on the architecture where it does makes
sense and is useful.
What other think about it? However I think this change could be done
after d-i beta1 since it would require testing removals and could
delay things a bit.
- --
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
- ---------------------------------------------
E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
- ---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFHnOROLqiZQEml+FURAlhfAKCcVrUQkdn2APej+cUPYTHQfEBrsACeOnxR
eZ23QeDkb0XLWXHa2cyc82w=
=Zc3b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: