Re: blockers for 64-bit adoption (Re: 64-bit transition deadline)
* Robert Millan (email@example.com) [070408 22:26]:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 09:57:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I agree that the distribution itself is well supported . For some reason,
> > though, its popularity doesn't reflect much wider spread availability of
> > 64-bit capable hardware, but that's a separate discussion.
> which IMHO deserves a separate thread. I'm not sure of the severity of this
> problem (maybe we could check via popcon how many of our i386 users have 64-bit
> capable hardware?), neither of its causes. I suspect the key factors are
> dependance on non-free browser plugins and missinformation.
Actually, please take this discussion on -project or somewhere else.
-release isn't a discussion list.