Re: Bug#413964: xulrunner: Broken xulrunner-plugin.pc causes gcj-4.1 to FTBFS
clone 413964 -1
reassign -1 classpath
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:26:59PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <email@example.com> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:07:53PM -0800, Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 01:37:49PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >>> If the gcj plugin is making use of xpcom, it should require xulrunner-xpcom
> >>> too.
> >>> See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366113#c8
> >> Still, this is an 11th-hour regression introduced by the new xulrunner,
> >> AFAICS. Even if the "bug" belongs to gcj-4.1, this change in xulrunner's
> >> behavior is grounds for not letting the new xulrunner into etch. Security
> >> updates need to not break related packages.
> > So what ? Better "fixing" xulrunner than gcj-4.1 ? This gets ridiculous.
> At this time, we don't know which other third-party application rely on
> this specific xulrunner configuration, and I really don't want to risk
> to break anything else. It's easier to revert this change for xulrunner
> now instead of testing every possible r-dep.
I checked all reverse dependencies that use the -plugin pkg-config file.
Only gcj-4.1 and classpath are affected.