On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 01:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Yes, and I'm afraid the code changes in 1.8.30 aren't something I'm willing > to let through; the shell code is subtle enough that my eyes are likely to > start bleeding before I'm able to give it a thorough review. aw. the bugs that the changes fix are pretty subtle themselves, fwiw, but one in particular could be rather nasty and would be nice to have fixed for the long haul in etch. i don't suppose i get any credit for having it in unstable for 40 days or so without any bug reports? would you be willing to accept a fix for  by itself without the quoting fixes? in any event, would an update to t-p-u with the new translations from 1.8.30 (with or without some of the fixes from 1.8.30) be acceptable? sean  the bug where package installation can fail globally if it's installed at the same time as a package that depends on it and the other package's config script runs first.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part