Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive

To: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive
From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:12:22 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070118181222.GA10059@glandium.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-release@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070118093338.GC4454@bee.dooz.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070117210335.GA19786@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 20070118091604.GD4643@takhisis.invalid> <[🔎] 20070118093338.GC4454@bee.dooz.org>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:33:38AM +0100, Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>
>    iceape (U)

This one is probably bug #405911, so you don't need to file it ;)

Mike

Reply to:

References:
- (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive
  - From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive
  - From: Loïc Minier <lool+debian@via.ecp.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Please remove Eclipse from Etch (was Re: Will eclipse be part of etch?)
Next by Date: Re: let apertium enter etch
Previous by thread: Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive
Next by thread: Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread