Re: hypothetical bin-NMU versioning question
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2006-10-02 "Kevin B. McCarty" <kmccarty@Princeton.EDU> wrote:
>> I have a hypothetical bin-NMU versioning question (this is asked only
>> for my curiosity, so don't give it a high priority). Suppose that
>> package X (version 1.0-1) is bin-NMU'ed on architectures A and B. At a
>> later time it needs to be bin-NMU'ed on architectures B and C.
> It was at
> 0.2.12-1+b1: amd64 s390
> 0.2.12-1: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips mipsel
> powerpc sparc
> previously and is now
> 0.2.12-1+b2: amd64
> 0.2.12-1+b1: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips mipsel
> powerpc s390 sparc
> Afaict the numbering is simply increased for each upload.
Thanks for the clear and decisive answer!
Kevin B. McCarty <firstname.lastname@example.org> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544