Re: Broken dependency of Kcontrol on Librwa1394
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 06:38:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le lun 25 septembre 2006 15:11, email@example.com a écrit :
> > Hi, further to my mail yesterday about the broken dependency of
> > kcontrol on libraw1394-5, please find below a message sent to the
> > libraw1394 maintainer and his answer.
> > Is there a way to improve coordination amongst Debian maintainers and
> > stop this finger-pointing attitude?
> there is no finger pointing going on. kdebase needs a binNMU (a rebuild)
> to be built against the last version of the libraw1394. A thing that
> ludovic should have asked for every reverse depends of that library.
> > A user.
> But I'm partly responsible of this because I forgot to ask him to look
> into this, and I was his sponsor for the libraw1394 package (here
> speaking with my KDE packager hat on).
> libraw1394 transition, the following 5 packages still have a Depends
> upon libraw1397-5:
> Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
> Package: kcontrol
> Package: lynkeos.app
> Package: motion
> Package: wengophone
There are actually quite a number of other packages still having this
dependency, though perhaps not all on the architecture you were looking at.
Anyway, except for kdebase and gst-plugins-good0.10, which were deferred on
account of some other lib transitions, these packages were all scheduled for
binNMUs -- but a lot of them failed for one reason or another. Those that
could be given back have been given back, leaving only three packages not
being rebuild: lynkeos.app, which needs updated for the (spurious) gnustep
-dev name change; wengophone, which FTBFS with a problem in its install
target; and motion, which FTBFS with bug #389304.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.