Re: Timeline for r3
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:07:51PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> I currently consider #373854 as RC for r3, and ask the security team to
> either update it with another DSA or to tell us if we should fix it via
I think there should be an update for this, Joey if you agree I'm
prepared to do the building and uploading on Sunday.
> Also i would like to know from the security team what they think about
>  and how to fix it.
After discussion with upstream, and other people, I would strongly
suggest we leave it as-is. Reverting to the previous broken behaviour
introduces the hole that the update fixed. Yes it is extremely
unfortunate that this causes some breakage but that isn't something
that can be easiy handled.