Re: summarizing arch status
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:19:10AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 11:24:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >> - traditionally weak with keeping up, but currently in good shape
> > I don't agree that http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-quarter-big.png
> > shows it "in good shape". We can expect the build load to get worse, not
> > better, with a push for the release...
> Those stats are and have been off for a long time. For example there
> are 60 packages in state Not-For-Us. That lowers the build percentage
> for m68k by nearly one percent alone.
Ah, given that one of the m68k porters has commit access to P-a-s, could
someone please sort through these N-F-U packages and get them into P-a-s
as appropriate so that we can have good data for this architecture instead
of having to look at other graphs?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.