On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:04:25PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > This is a follow-up to my email to debian-qa about packages that it > would be nice to remove from unstable, > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/05/msg00026.html > Two related packages and one of those on the list are also in testing: > # No point in having interchange-doc without interchange > # (not currently in testing). > remove interchange-doc/5.2.0-1 Then the correct procedure is to first file a serious bug against interchange-doc so that it doesn't wander back in on its own after the hint is removed. > # The most commonly installed binary package from gforge, gforge-common, > # has only 12 installations in popcon. One of its packages has been > # uninstallable for 64 days. There is also a possible security-related > # bug, #328224 (it is not RC only because no one has yet > # checked if it applies to the version in Debian, even though the bug > # was submitted 253 days ago). The versions in stable/testing/unstable > # are identical. > remove gforge/3.1-31 > # gforge has one reverse depends, gforge-theme-starterpack. > remove gforge-theme-starterpack/3.1-1 Removing these has been previously suggested on the list, so this is somewhere on the TODO stack already. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature