Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:44:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:14PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > What I'm saying is that no amout of proof that they will not be able
> > to meet the targets is relevant. What's relevant is actual failure to
> > do so, not your (or anyone else's) prognostications.
> the d-i isos are broken, and had i not been there, they will probably have
> been broken for another couple of month.
As it happens, Frans had already noticed the problem and pinged me about
it a few days ago, and I was just emerging from under a different pile
of work so I had some time to look at it anyway. Failures in the d-i
build logs don't go unnoticed, although I agree that this one took
longer to fix than it should have done.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]