Re: Status of Debian Sarge R2
* Thomas Weber (thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com) [060402 19:05]:
> is it possible that the references were mixed up in the previous mail? I
> think [1] and [3] should be switched.
>
> > All packages which we currently consider for R2 are listed at [1].
>
> > sudo: proposed fix exists at [2],
>
> > See [3] for a list of packages still missing in s-p-u but availible
> > via security.d.o.
>
> References:
> [1] http://release.debian.org/stable/missing-security.html
> [2] http://klecker.debian.org/~joey/security/sudo/
> [3] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases
>
> That said, if a package is in s-p-u, but not in the wiki page [3], does
> that mean it will not be part of R2? (The package I have in mind is
> 'octaviz').
That means that someone should add it as NOT YET OK to the wiki page.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: