On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:47:14PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:20:32 +0100, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> said: > > Re: Hubert Chan 2006-03-15 <[🔎] 87wtewjomu.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> > >> Adam released a new version of GNUstep Make and Base today that bumps > >> the soversion of -base. That means yet another GNUstep library > >> transition. argh. Hopefully this transition will go much smoother > >> than the last one (although we're still waiting on a few things in > >> NEW). > > Hrm. Can we at least try to have the current gnustep in etch before > > starting over again? > Hmm. I suppose you're right, since we're close to being there. > Can someone enlighten me as to some details about migration to testing? > e.g. If the new gnustep-gui moves to testing, that will break, for > example, the version of affiche that is in testing, and the version of > affiche that is in unstable can't move to testing until the new > gnustep-gui goes into testing. When gnustep-gui is ready to migrate to > testing, once all the other packages that depend on it are rebuilt, will > everything go in automatically, or will I need to bug someone to > override something? A hint is in place and waiting for all dependent packages to be ready since Feb. 10. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature