Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:47:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE
> > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting
> > > >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which is an at least as
> > > >serious a problem.
> > > No, on m68k it breaks at -O2 too. (#323016)
> > In any case, it's been fixed in the mean time.
> Why is #323016 still open then?
Sorry, looks like that's a different one after all, which indeed hasn't
been fixed yet. I was confused; sorry.
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond