>What do these have to do with getting GNOME 2.10 in? The last two are >not in testing at all right now, and I haven't noticed any of these >three packages listed in the hint output. Perhaps they don't... But they are dependencies of meta-gnome2, which *does* show up as broken in the hint output, and I can't see any other reason why it does. The alternative is presumably to kick meta-gnome2 out (perfectly reasonable).