libkpathsea transition (was: Transition status; please no new shlib bumps)
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Further transitions
> Please don't do.
> Any further transition has the potential to make it even harder to bring
> packages to testing, as this makes the barrier for packages to go to
> testing even higher.
Would it be acceptable to upload tetex-bin_3.0 with the binary packages
libkpathsea4(-dev), if at the same time we make sure that libkpathsea3
is still available? We could drop the "Provides: libkpathsea-dev" from
libkpathsea4-dev, so that no packages accidently gets compiled against
the new library.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich