Re: Coordinating upload of teTeX-3.0 to unstable
Andreas Barth writes:
> * Frank K?ster (email@example.com) [050726 12:34]:
> > Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > Currently, we have (at least) two large transitions at our hands:
> > > 1. gcc-4.0/glibc
> > > 2. xorg
> > >
> > > I really would be happy if we can avoid that tetex becomes part of any
> > > of these transitions. That means for me, in doubt don't upload tetex
> > > to unstable right now.
> > How long do you expect the transitions to take, and what would you think
> > is appropriate to replace doubt by knowlegde?
> What is appropriate for the second: Bring up ftp-master again :)
> Well, xorg seems to depend only on some small issues. Without being able
> to investigate further right now, we should be able to solve that in
> less than a weeks time after ftp-master is available again - or at
> least, we know much more. When that is done, I don't see a hard stopper
> for uploading tetex to unstable, except of course you should notify the
> maintainers again (e.g. via debian-devel).
please make sure, that tetex-bin builds on all architectures. avoid
having new arch-indep packages in unstable and unbuildable arch