Re: proposed fix to allow security support for fai-kernels in sarge (#297811)
Steve Langasek wrote:
> - Nothing in the source or binary package names matches the
> kernel.*2\.(4\.27|6\.8) regexp that I've been using so far to identify the
> kernel packages requiring attention
> I have no knowledge of how important the latter is to the security team;
> they may not be bothered by it as long as they're aware that this package
> exists which doesn't follow the usual naming convention. (which I presume
> that after this thread, at least one member of the security team *is* aware
> of this.)
I have a list of packages to take care of, we "only" need to rewrite
it once sarge is released and not forget about the list again. The
actual name of the package/source does not matter too much as long as
we are permanently aware of it.
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect.