Re: gcc-defaults, gcc-3.3, gcc-3.4 for testing
Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
sorry the delay. the noise doesn't affect the transition of -12 to
testing. As Kurt pointed out in
some packages may have slipped into sarge, which were built with
gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9. AFAIK you are unable to tell from the stripped
binaries, that it's built by this compiler version. Maintainers may
still use this compiler package ... Some buildds did pick up this
compiler version as well, namely mips and mipsel packages were
uploaded. The s390 buildd was upgraded as well, but AFAIK packages
built with this gcc were not uploaded to the archive, but rebuilt a
second time (Gerhard, please confirm).
Yes, there were 6 packages built with -9 on s390 and uploaded, but I
have done a binary NMU with the latest compiler for them in the meantime.