Anthony Towns wrote: > AFAICS 193062 shouldn't be serious, or even necessarily open. I don't > believe the presence of debug symbols violates anything in the sarge RC > policy, nor that it should do so. Subversion much be a good test case for detached debugging symbols in a separate package. The support is all there in the toolchain, gdb, and even in debhelper (--dbg-package=subversion-dbg), but I'm still waiting for anyone to use it. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature