Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
* Dirk Eddelbuettel (email@example.com) [041203 22:45]:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Dirk Eddelbuettel (firstname.lastname@example.org) [041203 06:15]:
> > > I think Richard is basically correct in his analysis. Bjorn's page lists
> > >
> > > octave2.1
> > > octave-forge
> > > octave-sp [ source package semidef-oct ]
> > >
> > > as mutually blocking themselves on Alpha -- but buildd.debian.org shows that
> > > all packages have built correctly.
> > I added an easy hint. Thanks for drawing our attention on it.
> Any idea when the "hint" would result in an actual transfer to testing?
I forget to add also ginac to that hint; should be working tonight, but
in any case, I will follow up that hint until it works (means: I will
look daily into it, until it works, and if it takes too long, I'll also
work with simulation runs). [And that is the strategy with any hint - as
soon as I pick it up, I will make sure that it actually works.]
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C