Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Dirk Eddelbuettel (email@example.com) [041203 06:15]:
> > I think Richard is basically correct in his analysis. Bjorn's page lists
> > octave2.1
> > octave-forge
> > octave-sp [ source package semidef-oct ]
> > as mutually blocking themselves on Alpha -- but buildd.debian.org shows that
> > all packages have built correctly.
> I added an easy hint. Thanks for drawing our attention on it.
Any idea when the "hint" would result in an actual transfer to testing?
A new Octave 2.1.64 was just released, but I'd like to get 2.1.63 into
If your hair is standing up, then you are in extreme danger.