Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

["Fabrice LORRAIN (home)" <Fabrice.Lorrain@chello.fr>]

Steve Langasek wrote:
> For the benefit of those following the discussion who haven't already heard
> via IRC or otherwise, 

Thanks for that.

....
> Second, KDE in unstable is not a good model to follow.  Between longstanding
> FTBFS bugs that ensured KDE 3.3 could not migrate to testing regardless of
> release policy, and the lack of testing autobuilders ensuring that no RC
> bugfixes make it to testing either, the upload of kdelibs 3.3 to unstable
> increased workload for both the KDE maintainers and the release team.  Any
> proposal for GNOME 2.8 in sarge will fare much better if judged on its own
> merits instead of pointing to KDE 3.3 for precedent.

If this is an answer to my previous mail, two comments :
- My point on kde was more "political" that techniwal (or personnal 
wishes). If gnome-2.8 hit sarge people _will_ want kde-3.3 in too 
(pressure, flamware. I guest you guys know the drill.
- Good to see that the choice are done on technical quality/sanity.

@+,

	Fab