Re: Please don't remove lilypond; a new version is awaiting confirmation
tags 250622 +pending
* Anthony Fok (email@example.com) [040622 05:55]:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:51:27 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok) remove lilypond/2.1.0-2
> > # 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139)
> > # no maintainer reaction
> > remove lilypond/2.1.0-2
> > # reverse depends: songwrite, alml
> > remove songwrite/0.12b-3
> > remove alml/2004.05.21-1
> Please don't remove lilypond... A new packaged was prepared, finished
> building it at 2004-06-18 04:36 +0800,
> and uploaded 2004-06-19 06:27+0800.
> It is currently in the queue waiting for manual overrides AFAIK.
> I splitted the architecture-independent part into the lilypond-data
> binary package.
Well, I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to solve a RC-bug with an
upload that needs to go through NEW. Also, if that information would
have been in the bug log, I wouldn't have proposed removal.
I removed that from my removal-suggestions-list, but of course, it's
the release managers decision.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C